The ISM services index for May 2025 registered at 49.9, below the predicted 52.0 and the previous 51.6. Key figures showed prices paid rising to 68.7, a decline in new orders to 46.4, and an improvement in employment to 50.7. Business activity stood at 50.0, supplier deliveries increased to 52.5, while inventories decreased to 49.7. The backlog of orders fell to 43.4, new export orders slightly dropped to 48.5, but imports rose to 48.2. Inventory sentiment improved to 62.9.
Despite potential market concerns, consumer spending remains constant, and government expenditure persists. The US dollar experienced selling and Treasury yields dipped by 2-4 basis points. Additionally, the USD/JPY dropped by 80 pips, with 50 pips of the decline attributed to these figures.
Mixed Sectoral Responses
Comments referencing the report mentioned issues like tariff fluctuations affecting supply chains, purchasing uncertainties due to budget cuts, and price hikes in the transportation sector. Some sectors reported steady business conditions and observed some growth, especially in consumer demand for retail trade. The report signals challenging trends, with mixed sectoral responses amid economic uncertainties.
Given the unexpected contraction in the services index for May—dipping just under the neutral threshold of 50.0—one thing becomes clear: activity across non-manufacturing sectors has slackened slightly, with key markers pointing to moderation rather than momentum. Traders ought to examine the figures not as isolated anomalies but as indicative of pressure building in pockets of consumer-facing industries and supplier networks. A drop in the headline figure below expectations, paired with retreating new orders and flattening business activity, suggests demand might be softening more broadly than anticipated.
We’ve had pricing data surprise to the upside; prices paid jumped meaningfully, showing that input costs are still pushing higher despite an overall moderation in activity. This implies that inflationary tendencies, at least in this part of the economy, are far from fading. That gain cannot be ignored. It tells us that businesses are absorbing higher costs even as new order volumes decline—an uneven combination that points to less predictable margins ahead, especially in sectors closely linked to logistics or reliant on high turnover.
Employment and Trade Flows
The rebound in employment might appear encouraging on its own—we saw modest growth there—but set against the shrinking backlog and lower inventory accumulation, it brings complexity. A firming labour component can suggest confidence in ongoing demand, but in this context, it may reflect prior hiring momentum that hasn’t adjusted yet to the emerging slowdown. New export orders and import readings, while still under 50, suggest a cautious lean in trade flows with neither showing collapse nor acceleration.
We read the Treasury market’s reaction—a minor yield retreat—as more of a recalibration than panic. A modest bidding for safety across duration after a weaker-than-expected report lines up with a narrative of uncertainty rather than outright deterioration. Combine that with the USD slipping modestly against the yen; part of the move seems driven by a readjustment in growth expectations.
One should read the qualitative remarks with an eye for where specific frictions may arise. There’s direct mention of tariff-related pressures feeding unpredictability into procurement strategies, and transport cost increases could continue to impact logistics-heavy industries. Reports of steady consumer demand in certain categories, such as retail trade, offer one of the few clearer positives, but they do not counterbalance broader softness on their own. Budgetary constraints are being flagged too—particularly by institutions facing internal cutbacks. That has repercussions for purchasing timelines and volumes, which may soon feed into updated inventory strategies.
These data do not indicate recessionary behavior yet, but they flag warning signs. Activity is levelling off where it was rising before. We are watching for the moment when firms shift from absorbing higher costs to passing them on. That point may not be far off.