Recent comments from bank and credit card executives suggest that US consumer spending remains steady, even with low consumer confidence. Top figures from Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, American Express, Visa, and Bank of America have shared an optimistic view of recent spending trends.
Goldman Sachs COO John Waldron linked the resilience of the US economy to robust employment and fiscal policies. Mastercard’s CEO Michael Miebach noted that spending trends from the first quarter have remained stable into May, despite negative news. American Express CEO Steve Squeri reported strong consumer spending across various sectors, with restaurants performing well. Visa CFO Christopher Suh commented that payment volume data is stable, indicating consumer resilience.
Resilience Of Us Economy
Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said consumer spending is up year-to-date, suggesting a robust economic base supported by consumers. Collectively, these insights offer a consistent and encouraging outlook on US consumer spending. This positive trend is expected to continue unless there are major economic shifts.
What we’re seeing here is a clear message: the consumer hasn’t backed off. Despite low confidence numbers appearing in surveys and headlines, behaviour tells a different story. Executives from some of the largest financial institutions and payment networks in the world are reporting a consistent trend—people are still buying, eating out, and living as usual. Not one of them mentioned a sharp slowdown or a sudden shift away from discretionary spending.
Waldron’s view links steady spending directly with stable employment and supportive fiscal environments. We know that jobs are often the backbone of household budgets, and his remarks suggest that there’s no widespread fear about paycheques disappearing anytime soon. Miebach, on the other hand, reinforced this by pointing out how spending patterns haven’t wobbled much, even as negative headlines pile up. That sort of steadiness, especially in early quarters, gives us a working signal that consumers aren’t reacting with knee-jerk caution.
Squeri brought forward performance broken down by categories—and the mention of restaurants matters more than it first appears. People cutting back tend to start with things they don’t need. The fact that diners are still full implies households feel steady enough to spend on leisure, not just essentials.
Suh provided the kind of data derivatives traders usually favour—volume measurements across payment activity. This touches every tier of consumer habits and provides a view of scale. His remarks give the impression that the volume tide has neither receded nor swelled beyond reason, which in current conditions could help confirm broad consumer health.
Economic Implications And Market Positioning
Then there’s Moynihan, who directly referenced year-to-date trends. That’s the kind of timeframe that cuts through daily noise and reflects default behaviour. His mention of rising spending into mid-year suggests there’s form behind the feelings.
What do we do with that? From our perspective, it narrows the fog traders often face. Low confidence often implies caution ahead, but when actual spending holds up, it adds constraints to how bearish positioning can go in the near term. Those trading forward guidance or preparing short-term options structures may find less reward in betting on a quick downturn. Consumer credit conditions would likely reflect trouble earlier than this group is signalling.
We would note that inflation remains a variable, and while wage growth isn’t covered directly here, spending resilience itself may pressure the expectations surrounding rate cuts. If consumers are still active and no sharp softening is detected by large card processors or banks, pressure remains on the Federal Reserve to hold rates as they are—or at least avoid rushing into easing.
This ongoing consumer activity also holds back the kind of volatility some may anticipate in retail-heavy equity indices. Short-dated gamma exposure will need to consider the absence of a clear directional catalyst from the consumption side. Moves in implied volatility may remain muted, and range-bound scenarios for consumer-exposed sectors seem more in line with this data stream.
Position sizing, especially in contracts linked to services or discretionary segments, should take into account the surprisingly firm consumer footing. Skew remains modest in many cases, and sentiment-driven setups based solely on consumer surveys may find limited support from the actual transaction data discussed here.
Overall, we are positioning for a market that is absorbing downside concern far better than the surface metrics imply. And those placing trades at the short end of the curve will want to align with the stability expressed by these corporate leads—at least for now.