According to BOE policymaker Clare Lombardelli, the current policy remains restrictive. She noted that wage growth remains elevated, which is a concern for achieving target inflation.

Lombardelli emphasised that wages are her primary focus when assessing disinflation potential. With recent progress in gradual disinflation and trade developments, a 25 basis points rate cut was deemed suitable.

Cautious Shift In Thinking

Lombardelli has highlighted what can be seen as a cautious shift in thinking within the Monetary Policy Committee. Her attention to wage trends suggests that income growth, despite signs of softening in other areas, still poses a possible challenge to bringing inflation back toward target. The idea here is that if people continue to secure higher pay, that often leads to greater spending, which in turn can keep prices moving upwards, even if supply chains and other cost factors have improved.

From our perspective, it’s apparent that the decision to vote for a relatively modest cut in rates points to a desire not to ease policy too quickly. A 25 basis points reduction reflects a nod to recent improvements, such as steadier pricing in goods and services, while still acknowledging that inflation persistently clings to areas affected by domestic factors, mainly wages.

The underlying message isn’t hard to interpret. Even though inflation data has started to cool off, expectations—particularly in services and negotiated pay—have not fallen in lockstep. That disconnect invites a more conservative pace to rate changes. What matters most here isn’t the headline inflation print, but what’s driving it under the surface. When pay packets continue outpacing productivity or demand remains persistent in wage-sensitive sectors, the disinflation process risks losing momentum.

Market Expectations And Policy Indications

As people analysing market expectations, we should notice that rate-sensitive instruments may begin to embed a more drawn-out easing cycle. Not just in terms of timing, but also in size. The policy stance described as ‘restrictive’ tells us it’s still above neutral—intended to dampen demand carefully rather than encourage it outright. So, forward pricing needs to take into account the priority the Committee places on seeing clearer evidence that wage pressures are cooling materially. Otherwise, the appetite for additional reductions stays restrained.

Bailey’s earlier remarks have already hinted at this balancing act. While broad inflation progress has justified a reassessment, caution colours the tone of most recent speeches. That tendency to lean on services inflation and pay growth as evidence that the job isn’t done yet now finds expression in the committee split.

Dislocation between market expectations and policymakers’ actual signals is where opportunity—and risk—sits. If swaps, for example, start betting on deeper cuts within a shorter horizon, it reflects a bet that the Bank has confidence inflation will retreat more rapidly. However, the weight policymakers are placing on pay dynamics may delay such anticipation from being fulfilled. That’s relevant now, as traders start to look beyond summer.

Sentiment can turn swiftly around the release of wage and price data. But the shift in voting pattern this month gives us a subtle sign—members are willing to adjust if conditions allow, yet not until underlying drivers come into better alignment. Inflation metrics without pay metrics no longer suffice as forward guidance indicators.

Current yields might already be moving to price in this change of communication stance. The next weeks will likely feed off incremental data trends—labour market releases, unit labour costs, and updated inflation figures. Those are now the core input variables that may tilt the rate expectation scale one way or the other. The more evidence we see of tighter labour slack easing, faster than anticipated, the more room we’ll likely price in.

Interpreting this shift requires attention to both data flow and the policy reaction function it invites. The leeway for the Bank to loosen further remains contingent more on wage moderation than on broader disinflation alone. That nuance may catch out shorter-tenor instruments if expectations run too far ahead of reality.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.