Gold is experiencing increased demand as a safe haven, particularly as alternatives like the US dollar and government bonds have diminished appeal. This trend has been noted amidst unstable policies, providing insight into risk perceptions.

There has been a noticeable preference for Gold futures, leading to a 150% increase in holdings on the COMEX from December to April, reaching 45 million ounces. This surge underscores the value seen in Gold during uncertain periods.

Growing Gold Exposure in the Eurozone

In the eurozone, Gold exposure is also growing, with derivatives’ notional value increasing by 58% since last November, reaching EUR 1 trillion by March’s end. A considerable portion of these transactions carries inherent counterparty default risks.

Caution is advised when interpreting information regarding market and instrument profiles. Thorough personal research is essential before making investment decisions, as all risks, including the potential loss of principal, are the investor’s responsibility.

What we’re seeing is a marked pivot towards perceived stores of value, driven not by growth potential but rather by preservation motives. The jump in Gold futures activity—especially the leap in COMEX holdings from December through April—makes that evident. When traders add over 25 million ounces of exposure in four months, the message is clear: capital isn’t chasing yield, it’s looking for park-and-wait options. The rise isn’t just in volume—it’s in how that volume is being structured, with a focus on long positions that appear to be held rather than traded through.

Increased activity in eurozone Gold derivatives strengthens that view. A 58% increase in notional value over a five-month period is not an ordinary uptick; it’s a repricing of faith in fiat-linked debt instruments. EUR 1 trillion marks a psychologically powerful number, but what’s less discussed—yet more pressing—is how much of that exposure is backed by counterparties who may not hold up if market stress deepens. Performance risk has re-entered the conversation after years of being dismissed as a back-office concern.

Rethinking Market Assumptions and Risks

From our standpoint, the spike in counterparty sensitivity belies a certain resignation that central policy levers are no longer enough to shore up conviction. The fact that Gold is being leaned on heavily again, even when real yields remain positive, flags a deeper distrust in duration-based safety. Traders would do well to not view these signals simply as short-term hedging behaviour; they reflect a build-up of pressure under the layer of daily volatility.

The assumption that traditional fixed income is the automatic choice in times of policy uncertainty no longer holds. As such, reliance on default risk analysis within derivatives becomes more than a checkbox exercise. In practical terms, pricing routes, quality of collateral, and execution continuity need to be revisited. There’s little room for blind optimism around margin efficiency.

Moreover, it would be wise to rethink assumptions around liquidity. Gold operates within a concentrated trading structure, where slippage and spread behaviour can change rapidly under volume stress. What seems liquid in calm times doesn’t always translate well once broader flows shift. This matters particularly for leveraged strategies and those carrying rolling contracts across expiry cycles.

There’s no need for outright retraction from directional opinions, but there’s also no excuse now for complacency around structural risk. Those adjusting positions across derivative instruments, especially with exposure linked to commodities like Gold, should approach each layer of the trade with fresh scrutiny. Not because the environment is new, but because its tolerances have narrowed.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.