Trade Negotiations Timeline
Donald Trump recently announced imposing 50% tariffs on EU goods starting 1 June due to stalled negotiations with the European Union, claiming EU discrimination. However, following discussions between Trump and the President of the European Commission, these tariffs were postponed to 9 July to give time for further negotiation.
The postponement of reciprocal tariffs by 90 days and successful talks with the UK and China have calmed market concerns. Nonetheless, the threat of a trade war remains, with Trump’s tariffs on EU goods far exceeding previous announcements. The UK-US trade deal, although criticised, appears more favourable compared to potential EU outcomes.
Uncertainty persists as the tariff deadline approaches, with hopes for a deal by 9 July. While previous tariffs are temporarily paused, it is uncertain what has been resolved. As negotiations continue, further market turbulence is anticipated, especially with the 90-day suspension nearing its end.
That Trump delayed the tariffs does offer a temporary sense of relief, but the risk isn’t off the table. The 50% rate he introduced raised eyebrows not only for its sharp jump from typical levels, but also because it overshot previous suggestions by a wide margin. The figure, much higher than counterparts had initially anticipated, hints at a negotiation tactic rather than a final policy position. We can see that as a way of applying pressure — it’s not just about trade, it’s leverage.
The delay to 9 July, after talks with the Commission President, gives everyone a window. A relatively short one. Any movement before then is likely to reflect positioning rather than outright settlement. And the fact that reciprocal measures from the EU have been postponed by 90 days suggests that both sides remain wary of escalation, while not yet confident enough in the talks to fully pull back.
Market Reactions and Strategies
Markets responded to this in a way we might expect. Relief, at first, and then a slow realisation that the underlying issue hasn’t been addressed — it’s only been deferred. Traders in derivatives markets should treat the delay not as a solution but as a pause button. Volatility is very likely to intensify as we move closer to that rescheduled date. Risk spreads may widen again depending on how closely chatter around the negotiations tracks, especially in sectors directly affected by auto or manufacturing exports.
Coordination with China and the UK helps explain why this moment hasn’t triggered a broader market correction. Their recent agreements — or at least the impressions of progress there — have worked like sandbags against flooding sentiment. Even so, the trade relationship with the EU holds a different kind of weight. There’s more structural entanglement across industries, and we know from previous episodes that the threat of disruption there pulls in more asset classes and creates deeper hesitation in allocation.
For those involved in options or futures linked to eurozone sectors, this delay should be seen as an opportunity to reassess margin exposure while there’s less pressure in order books. Still, the path forward will likely be skewed by headlines. Any talk of retaliation — from officials on either side — isn’t rhetoric we can ignore. It’s often laced with the kind of foreshadowing that leads to fast repricing.
We’ve got precedent here. The 2018 cycle showed how quickly nominal announcements turned into concrete measures, and how resistance from central banks wasn’t enough to fully offset the pricing distortions that followed. Anyone with exposure to EU-US differentials, especially in equities, should look at how these mechanisms behaved back then. Patterns are reappearing now, albeit with more aggression in the initial figures.
It’s wise not to assume the extension means a softer approach will follow. Tariffs of this scale are not noise; they’re structural threats. And when we see fluctuations in risk-on signals across sectors like energy, aerospace, and agri-business, they often trace back to subtle changes in the status of these trade talks.
As we edge nearer to July, implied volatility on relevant contracts is likely to firm up. While outright repositioning may be premature ahead of 9 July, this is a time to hone hedging strategies rather than wait. Better to hold protection early than scramble for liquidity when headlines flash.