China’s April trade data is scheduled to be released on Friday, 9 May 2025, with expectations to reflect the impact of tariffs. Meanwhile, discussions regarding a potential trade agreement between the US and China are set to occur in Switzerland over the weekend.

A report suggests the White House may consider reducing China tariffs to 50%. This is listed in the snapshot from the ForexLive economic data calendar, with times presented in GMT and previous month or quarter results shown for comparison.

ForexLive.com is transitioning into investingLive.com later this year, aiming to provide enhanced market updates. It is essential to understand that forex trading has a high risk level, with leverage adding potential for increased loss.

Understanding ForexLive’s Role

ForexLive is not an investment advisor but a source of economic and market information for reference. It advises clients to critically assess any opinions or analysis for their own decision-making, with no endorsement of external views provided. The information on their website is offered as general commentary and not as trading advice.

What we’ve seen so far is a concise briefing on two likely market-moving timelines: China’s April trade data and US-China trade talks. Both could bring price volatility in the derivatives space. The first event, the Chinese trade report, is expected to account for any economic strain from ongoing tariffs. The second—the scheduled negotiations in Switzerland—might open the way for changes to existing trade policy, particularly around American tariff cuts. The suggestion that existing tariffs could be halved is not mere noise; it hints at a coordinated political shift rather than reactionary tweaks. While it’s not confirmed, the leak alone could sway positioning as market participants revisit their assumptions.

Now, what should be clear is that both scheduled developments are binary in nature. One reveals a statistical outcome; the other holds potential for forward-looking policy action. The former helps build a sense of current external demand and internal resilience. The latter may ignite speculation on cross-border shifts in capital allocation. Either way, we shouldn’t be expecting the quiet sort of Fridays and Sundays that often come before routine Mondays.

Phillips’ report about the White House’s tariff review appears tailored to nudge sentiment ahead of the weekend. If the trial balloon about a 50% cut in China tariffs holds water, we might see early repricing across futures tied to trade-sensitive indexes and commodities. Copper, for example, often moves in parallel with Chinese industrial health, while semiconductors tend to be exposed to the exchange of intermediate goods. Spread trades balancing commodity currencies against those with high US exposure could become more active—not necessarily favouring a single direction, but seeing tighter reaction windows.

The Upcoming Week’s Market Dynamics

Judging by past price action in similar macro setups, volatility tends to cluster once data meets narrative. With two scheduled catalysts only days apart, advanced setups need weighting that accounts for both confirmation and surprise. Plenty will depend not just on the trade figures but how markets interpret the tone and specifics of whatever comes out of Switzerland.

From our perspective, this positions the upcoming week as highly reactionary. Early-week pricing may become a function of positioning rather than fundamentals, which opens a narrow corridor for mispricing in short-expiry options. If you’re running Greeks-heavy strategies, clipping gamma through diagonals might be more effective than outright directionality. More nimble setups should avoid artificial exposure to long-dated contracts, as liquidity often dries up in periods of binary political risk.

One more thing worth noting: this isn’t the first time tariff rhetoric and trade data have coincided. During similar cycles in 2019 and 2020, premiums expanded sharply at the front of the curve while the back-end often lagged, suggesting traders prioritised the impact window instead of the theme size. Don’t be surprised if the front VIX term structure echoes that behaviour.

For those charting index derivatives or alpha-neutral backtests, calendar spreads might offer lower tail risk if they mirror implied dislocations rather than latch onto thematic trends. It’s not so much about picking a direction and more about recognising the window for distortion, especially one defined by overlapping macro headlines.

We won’t pretend all of this is clean. There’s bound to be boatloads of unexpected narrative noise once the diplomatic headlines start cycling out. But that, too, is part of the setup. As always, it helps to be fluid.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.