Germany’s Chancellor states the commitment to preventing a long-term trade conflict with the United States. Germany aims to support the European Union in securing numerous trade agreements.

Efforts will be made to address one-sided dependencies on China under the banner of strategic de-risking. An agreement on the US-EU trade deal remains pending, and a 10% tariff on EU imports is becoming a possibility.

Complexity Of International Trade Relations

There is uncertainty about the EU’s capacity to withstand a prolonged trade war with the US. This situation underscores the complexity of international trade relations.

These remarks from the German Chancellor reflect a renewed effort to contain potential friction while maintaining influence in global supply chains. The references to strategic de-risking signal an intent to rebalance economic exposure—especially as Europe begins recalibrating its stance towards Beijing. While the position remains diplomatic on the surface, the clear acknowledgment of dependencies suggests that a shift in trade policy has already begun behind closed doors.

The pending arrangement between the United States and the European Union isn’t just a hypothetical point of conversation—it now carries exact implications for market participants, particularly after comments surrounding a possible 10% tariff on European products. Though not yet implemented, the pricing in of such a measure may require close monitoring over the next few weeks. Pricing models relying on past tariff environments could become unreliable if sentiment hardens further.

The Chancellor’s statements aim to temper reactions but they also highlight the limitations of thin optimism. Markets often react not to announcements but to energy behind the lobbies influencing them. In this case, we’re potentially heading towards more protective stances between partners who were seen as aligned not long ago. Energy, automotive, and luxury sectors—and the derivative instruments tied to them—could see increasing volume as hedging exposure becomes a direct response rather than a precaution.

Volatility In Trade Policy

Scholz is effectively walking a line between long-term realignment and short-term diplomatic containment. The problem for us lies in the delay: negotiations drag, but pricing pressures escalate quickly. Bonds, equity futures, and currency derivatives will move not because of outcomes, but because of the added delay itself. In the short term, volatility on euro-dollar derivatives should be expected, particularly near key option expiries aligned with expected trade policy announcements.

Viewing this through the lens of sentiment and positioning, liquidity may thin out on certain forward contracts due to hedging caution—less volume, wider spreads. We must also consider correlations: tech-linked contracts may behave differently than defensive sectors, influenced heavily by transatlantic exposure ratios.

Pressure might also mount from secondary effects. For example, if Asia begins to interpret this shift as a new front in trade restrictions, there could be additional flow into commodity-linked hedges. We shouldn’t dismiss the likelihood of hedging activity spilling into pairs like USD/JPY or EUR/CHF, which are instinctively treated as safe tensions rise.

Structural fragmentation is becoming part of the conversation. Any remaining expectation of a seamless supply system is being dismantled, sector by sector. The consequence? A long-needed reassessment of covariant risk in multi-country exposure. Let’s be ready for implied volatilities to deviate markedly from realised ones. Portfolio implications won’t just be mechanical—they’ll be dictated by the order and pace at which these strings of announcements are interpreted by capital flows.

We are, in effect, not responding to decisions but to the prolonged absence of them.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.