Canada’s trade balance for March showed a deficit of C$0.51 billion, surpassing expectations of C$1.56 billion. Exports amounted to C$69.90 billion, slightly lower than February’s C$70.04 billion, while imports reached C$70.40 billion, a decrease from February’s C$71.44 billion.
Exports to the U.S. dropped by 6.6% in March, following declines from January’s peak. Despite this, exports to the U.S. remained 2.5% higher compared to November 2024. Imports from the U.S. decreased by 2.9%, reducing Canada’s trade surplus with the U.S. from C$10.8 billion in February to C$8.4 billion in March.
March Export And Import Performance
Total exports in March fell by 0.2% after a 5.4% drop in February, but were up 10.2% year-over-year. U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods affected performance. In volume terms, exports rose by 1.8%. Consumer goods saw a 4.2% decrease, with notable drops in meat products (10.8%) and pharmaceuticals (7.0%).
March imports decreased by 1.5%, breaking a five-month growth streak. Energy products fell 18.8%, while metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 15.8%. Volume-based imports slightly declined by 0.1%. Data delays affected import statistics, causing reliance on estimates for several product categories.
What we’ve seen is a narrower trade deficit than forecasted, in part due to a milder-than-expected decline in exports and a pullback in imports. Notably, although exports slipped slightly from February, they still showed a solid gain compared to the previous year. By volume, shipments went up, suggesting that price softening—rather than outright demand weakness—played a larger part in the dollar decrease. For those examining forward pricing and contract structuring, this distinction is worth factoring in.
Exports to the United States declined once again, though the fall must be viewed in the context of a still-elevated yearly position. If we step back, the temporal shift matters: volumes are up on a real basis, but the value has dropped, as pricing—particularly for certain manufactured goods and resources—has skewed. Add to this the headwinds brought on by tariffs, and it starts to paint a picture not of a system under duress, but one responding to external cost pressures.
Insights On Trade Dynamics
With imports slipping by a larger margin than exports, March defied expectations in an unexpected direction. A sizable retreat in energy-related purchases led the decline. More broadly, the metal and processed materials sectors joined the downshift. That change followed a consistent run-up over five months, so some respite here was perhaps overdue. But it’s worth noting that the contraction wasn’t purely real—volume-based imports only inched lower, meaning prices probably did more of the heavy lifting.
From our standpoint, when import values fall faster than import volumes, there’s usually room to infer weaker price pressure or favourable currency effects. For spread trades or options tied to input pricing, that’s a useful signal. What’s unclear at this point is how much of this softening was due to actual business demand retreating versus statistical noise due to the acknowledged gaps in the data. With several product lines missing confirmed reads and having to rely on estimates, calibration bias must be taken into account.
Moreover, the easing in consumer goods, especially in subcategories like meat and pharmaceuticals, points to either shorter-term inventory cycles or margin protections filtering through the import side. In derivative terms, this could justify caution on product-linked contracts sensitive to retail consumption and overseas exposure.
If we map the trade dynamics here to counterpart pricing, what emerges is not just a story of goods moving or slowing, but of altered terms—of trade, of cost, of input alignment. The surplus position with the United States, while still robust, narrowed at a pace unlikely to remain consistent unless bilateral frictions get resolved or reversed. For now, it’s more a drift than a turn.
Watching where the value-versus-volume divergence takes us across both exports and imports will be key. This month reflected more in prices than in activity flow, and that ratio has ramifications for shorter maturity rolls. As volatility across commodities and manufactured inputs adjusts, what matters most is how spreads behave within the curve, not just the headline totals.