Bank of America anticipates a rise of 150,000 in nonfarm payrolls for May, exceeding the consensus expectation of 120,000, though lower than April’s 177,000. However, they caution about potential downside risks due to trade-related hiring fluctuations.
The unemployment rate is predicted to stay steady at 4.2%. Hiring in trade and transportation sectors might have paused following initial increases prompted by tariff uncertainties.
Impact of Tariff Policy on Job Growth
There is a concern that ongoing uncertainty regarding tariff policy could impact job growth, even though large-scale layoffs are not foreseen at this time. Bank of America suggests that any slight shortfall in expectations is unlikely to alter the Federal Reserve’s current policy.
The projected increase in payrolls is seen as stronger than consensus, yet the risks associated with tariffs remain a concern. The current stability in the labour market supports maintaining the Fed’s stance unless a more pronounced slowdown manifests.
What the excerpt above tells us, in no uncertain terms, is that hiring is still growing but at a slower pace than before. Bank of America expects a moderate bump in job creation – stronger than what others expect, but weaker than last month. That suggests the overall labour market remains firm for now, but it’s no longer accelerating. The core idea is that the central bank isn’t likely to shift direction on interest rates unless there’s a more noticeable drop in job data. Yet, underlying that view is a layer of caution. There’s a risk to the downside, and the culprit seems to be the unpredictability of trade conditions, not broad economic weakness.
Particularly, hiring in trade-heavy sectors – logistics and goods transport – appears to have slowed. That’s unsurprising given the current trade-related policy concerns that continue to affect both planning and sentiment. Employers in those areas may be hesitating, waiting to see how policies shake out before committing further. When tariffs are unclear or pending, decisions on investment and expansion often get pushed back. That makes sense on a corporate level, but for those of us watching markets and volatility indices, it may present short-term distortions.
Tactical Implications for Investors
In simple terms, payroll growth still supports the idea that the economy is resilient, but some gauges – namely those tied to trade-sensitive employers – are flashing yellow lights. It is not because of worsening fundamentals, but because of delays in new hiring amid unclear policy signals. Unlike widespread job losses, which normally shake up decision-making among rate-setters, what we have now is more of a pause. That keeps policy on hold and reduces headline risk for rates positions.
From a tactical perspective, this makes timing more delicate than directional conviction. What we’re seeing is a softening at the edges, not a breakdown at the core. That’s a different environment to trade.
We should be considering exposure to sectors and indices that tend to react sharply to monthly jobs data but won’t necessarily justify sustained pricing momentum if the headline prints modestly above or below consensus. Options pricing may continue to understate potential volatility, especially ahead of May’s report, given that data surprise risk seems skewed toward the soft side.
Because rate expectations remain anchored unless jobs data materially cools, fixed income vol may stay muted, but gamma could still offer near-term setups. Put spreads or low-delta call structures on indices exposed to industrial hiring could be tuned for asymmetric return, particularly if traders are discounting the possibility of a reversal or confirmation move after the release.
People like Harris have warned that even a modest miss could invite overreaction in the shorter-tenor contracts. We agree that keeping positioning flexible and not overly committed going into payrolls could be better than pressing directional views. We’ll be watching not only the headline figure, but revisions and sector breakdowns – especially warehousing, wholesale trade, and heavy freight.
There’s enough fragility here that moves could accelerate quickly in either direction despite limited real change in the top-line hiring number. Such divergence between data and pricing behaviour is typically where opportunity hides.