Semiconductors, the fourth most traded goods globally, are integral to many consumer products. The US is conducting investigations into semiconductor supply chains, with potential 25% tariffs, raising concerns among US industry representatives who prefer domestic incentives.

Tariffs could impact a wide range of electronics and related sectors, as semiconductors account for over 4% of 2024 global exports. While the US dominates about half of the semiconductor supply chain, it is complex, involving few economies like China, Taiwan, and Korea.

Potential Impact of Tariffs

These countries are deeply integrated into the semiconductor network and could face vulnerabilities from raised tariffs. Analysis indicates a 25% semiconductor tariff could lower US GDP growth by 0.2 percentage points in the first year.

The risks and uncertainties in the semiconductor market highlight the potential economic repercussions of these tariffs. Semiconductors’ essential role across many industries suggests widespread ramifications could occur due to these trade measures.

The article outlines a potential shift in trade policy that directly targets semiconductors—components we depend on in nearly every digital device we touch. It raises a detailed concern about the United States’ proposed 25% tariff and lays out the ramifications not just for domestic production, but also for tightly intertwined international production systems. The key issue is this: semiconductors may be designed in one country, manufactured in another, and finally assembled elsewhere. When one piece is pushed out of sync, the entire value chain feels the tremor.

The US’ sway over nearly half the global semiconductor production process is considerable, but it’s not without delicate dependencies. China, Taiwan, and Korea—important sources for various stages of chip fabrication and assembly—are not easily replaceable, certainly not without time or cost. Their geographic and logistical role is so embedded that any disruption, such as tariffs, introduces measurable frictions.

Economic Sentiment and Market Reactions

Goldman Sachs’ estimates, calculated with a clear eye on tangible outcomes, have modelled that GDP growth in the US could drop by 0.2 percentage points in the first year of such tariffs. That’s not theoretical. It’s money, innovation, and production momentum simply lost in translation between trade objectives and operational viability. While this drop might seem modest in isolation, when coupled with downstream effects in consumer electronics, automotive systems, and industrial technologies, the result grows louder.

From our side, we’re weighing the risks to volatility. A policy decision like this—especially involving multi-billion dollar sectors—doesn’t just move macroeconomic data; it moves sentiment, which in turn can distort pricing across futures tied to technology equities, regional ETFs, and even FX pairs with trade-sensitive currencies. Whether it’s exposure through Taiwan’s export-reliant chip firms or indirect wagers via large-cap American tech stocks with deep chip dependencies, any unexpected shift can catch derivative positions wrong-footed.

Therefore, positioning in the near term needs a refined touch. We aren’t advising to step away completely, but hedging against announcement volatility may prove smarter than chasing directional plays. Trade policy is notoriously hard to time with precision, and any headlines—whether drawn from the Office of the US Trade Representative, or via responses from China’s Ministry of Commerce—can set off sharp moves. The policy machinery does not operate in a vacuum; it leaks sentiment that traders digest into pricing almost instantly.

What we also see is asymmetry in how tariff measures may affect the upstream versus downstream parts of the chain. For derivative structures, this asymmetry provides opportunity—but only if structured carefully. Long gamma positions on equity indices heavily weighted in semiconductors could buffer sudden lurches. Likewise, spreads that isolate performance of domestic chip designers versus fabricators abroad are worth scrutinising. The trade friction may inflict uneven pressure; we can use that.

Looking forward two to four weeks, implied volatilities in tech-adjacent indices are rising—not spike-levels, but with a steepening skew. Options pricing is adjusting to potential policy noise, yet not fully pricing aggressive escalation. That gives some room for tactical portfolio overlays in either volatility buying or relative-value trades. Temporarily leaning short on tariff-vulnerable Asian indices, while defending US-oriented chip suppliers, can be constructed with defined downside risk.

The broader read is clear: any shift in the semiconductor trade axis, however well-intentioned, reverberates far beyond the dockyards. There’s no such thing as a quick adjustment in a supply chain built over decades. Investors who map price action to policy risk with speed and precision are better equipped to navigate the next movement.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.