Insights 
VT 
Nasdaq futures are currently trading at $21,882, with a bullish entry zone identified between $21,850 and $21,860. A retracement to this zone could present a more strategic entry point for traders.
Bearish Trade Plan
The bearish trade plan suggests activation below $21,800, showing a potential shift in market sentiment. Volume Profile and VWAP are crucial tools, offering visibility on price levels and serving as benchmarks for trading decisions.
For bullish trades, suggested profit targets include $21,879, $21,893, $21,924, and $21,980. For bearish trades, targets are set at $21,792, $21,777, $21,751, and $21,723.
Traders are advised to take partial profits systematically and adjust stop-loss levels after achieving certain targets. The tradeCompass system recommends a disciplined approach of limit trades to one per direction each session.
Additional trading insights and opportunities can be found on the channels of investingLive.com. To stay updated with real-time market insights, traders can join the investingLive.com Stocks Telegram channel.
Directional Guidance
The provided analysis offers directional guidance but should not be viewed as financial advice. Traders should consider their strategies and risk management protocols while making trading decisions.
What we’re seeing here is a short-term structure forming with tighter price compression just under recent highs. The current price level of Nasdaq futures at $21,882 places it just outside of what’s been marked as a buy zone between $21,850 and $21,860. When price action revisits measured zones like this after a push higher, it often reflects a shift in momentum rather than immediate weakness. In our experience, this sort of move implies a purposeful pullback rather than lack of interest.
The suggested bull levels—those targets around $21,879 through to $21,980—show layering of potential exit points designed for staggered exits. These levels are not only logical but are tactically placed near areas of prior reaction in the book. That tells us there’s been intent behind their creation, not wishful thinking. Moves towards these levels, particularly the higher band around $21,980, generally come with narrowing risk windows and a fade in volatility—two conditions that reward tightened executions.
Importantly, the short scenario pinpoints $21,800 as the spot where active risk shifts into gear, which isn’t just a random figure. It reflects a breakdown into older acceptance zones. We frequently see slippage increase when these key levels are breached with genuine participation. That sequence of targets down to $21,723 offers clear steps for those managing the short side. Don’t chase it if it plunges through all at once, but recognise the staging that’s been built into the targets. It allows for trimming risk incrementally rather than relying on a full move.
Volume Profile and the VWAP, which have been highlighted, serve as active feedback mechanisms rather than fixed tools. When we work with these, we’re essentially gauging how much consensus the market has had at specific prices. Holding above VWAP tends to affirm continuation strategies. Conversely, the moment you find price pinned below, it often marks where sentiment has quietly soured.
What stands out is the caution towards overtrading—it’s recommended to stick with one directional idea per session, which some may overlook. We’ve found this to be not just prudent, but essential when volatility can spike intraday without notice. The act of trading less often ends in a better outcome, not because it limits opportunity, but because it avoids compounding error. If a long idea doesn’t trigger or fails to hold above the first checkpoint, let it go. Ember continues to guide this way of thinking—take what the market offers without forcing it.
Partial exits and adjusted stops aren’t accessories to the trade; they are core mechanics that prevent outsized losses and protect gains when targets are reached. If a target’s hit and nothing shifts in your stop, you’re letting a good trade turn into a coin toss. Always adjust. That takes emotion out of it.
For reference, Lin, whose framework helped shape this approach, has consistently favoured measured targets with feedback loops attached—perhaps why his plans tend to remain relevant across multiple sessions. Structured, precise, and well backtested setups are never static, but when one fails to break meaningfully in either direction, we usually interpret that as reduced commitment by participants rather than confusion.
In the days ahead, consider the reaction levels already shown. If price returns to the buy zone and reacts with higher volume, we will likely position accordingly. If it fails and stammers under $21,800, we’ll reassess for short bias, taking less size but moving deliberately between premarked targets. Above all, don’t treat daily noise as change—only act when levels engage clearly.
