US-China trade talks are ongoing in London, with discussions centred on export controls. Positive feedback emerged from the US camp, as Trump mentioned receiving “good reports” from his team. The talks are focused on concessions in key sectors of interest to both nations.

China is offering rare earth exports as an act of goodwill. Meanwhile, the US is proposing the export of important technology related to chip production and aircraft. The overall US-China relationship remains strained, with the issue of decoupling continuing to persist.

Both parties might be aiming for small gestures to pave the way for addressing significant trade issues. Past negotiations, such as the 2019 soybean agreement, suggest caution, as long-term commitments remain uncertain. Markets are expected to react optimistically in the short term despite underlying tensions.

Ongoing Negotiations Focus

The ongoing negotiations between the United States and China, currently taking place in London, are focused squarely on export restrictions, particularly in sectors that have sparked international interest. Trump’s comment about having received “good reports” gives us a window into a relatively upbeat short-term outlook from Washington’s side. That doesn’t assure anything long-lasting, but it does mean that, for now, talks are progressing without open hostility.

From Beijing’s end, rare earths are once again being used strategically—offered not out of excess supply but as a calculated move that could help unlock concessions. Think of it less as a trade and more as a lever, used to extract support or flexibility in other areas.

The Americans, in turn, have placed technology on the table—namely materials and components essential for aircraft manufacturing and chip design. These are not marginal industries. We’re dealing with cornerstones of national industrial policy. But offering them, even modestly, signals an awareness that China remains a key participant in the global manufacturing chain, irrespective of political narratives.

That said, tensions aren’t falling away; the issue of economic decoupling is not going anywhere. The two economies are still trying to untangle from years of dependence, but neither side can afford a clean break without collateral. So instead of sweeping pacts, what we’re likely witnessing is a series of tactical overtures. These are not designed to solve everything—they’re more to nudge talks along without any party appearing weak.

Earlier stages of this relationship give us a reference point. The soybean deal of 2019 showed that symbolism can outweigh substance in these talks. Markets responded happily back then, but that optimism faded fast when outcomes fell short. So even now, any market rally, particularly in currency or equity markets tied to trade flows, should be watched with restraint.

Impact On Market Dynamics

We bear in mind how short-term optimism can distort long-term visibility. For traders watching derivatives tied to technology and minerals, timing becomes paramount. Movement is happening mostly on sentiment and signals, not binding terms. Volatility could creep in if declarations shift or media reports exaggerate minor gestures.

The scope for overreaction remains high. Any pricing model assuming a stable US-China relationship through the quarter runs a real risk of misjudgement. In periods like these, we rely more heavily on intra-day signals and less on thematic positioning. Option skews may widen unexpectedly, and implied volatility could be pulled higher even without fresh headlines—simply because expectations are poorly anchored.

We are not anticipating a binding framework, but the potential for either side to release statements that gesture toward progress is strong. As such, we watch not just state media and official press releases but also offhand comments and reports from third-party advisers, who have often foreshadowed shifts in tone.

As we track events into next week, liquidity levels in correlated sectors—particularly those involving semi-conductors, aviation supply chains, and industrial minerals—are likely to be affected even by low-probability speculation. We’re adjusting accordingly, reducing tail risk exposures where hedging premiums allow, and relying more on short-dated structures that respond quickly if sentiment flips.

Traders not adapting to the tempo of these talks—slow in law, but fast in impact—could find positions challenged by moves that appear straight from the news cycle. We’re not seeing new fundamentals; we’re seeing renewed interest in shaping perception. That’s where most of the trade opportunity lies for now.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.