The euro maintained a steady presence across various indicators of international currency use, accounting for around 19% of the global market. Despite facing new challenges, such as the rise of cryptocurrencies, the euro remains resilient.

In 2024, the euro retained its status as the second most important global currency. Its global appeal is supported by sound euro area policies and strong, rules-based institutions.

Increase In Gold Accumulation

Central banks have increased their accumulation of gold at record levels, showing continued interest in traditional reserves. Meanwhile, some countries are exploring alternatives to conventional cross-border payment systems.

There is evidence of geopolitical alliances influencing currency choice in global trade. This trend is particularly visible since the conflict in Ukraine began, affecting invoicing currency patterns.

This article highlights how the euro has held its ground as a preferred currency for international use. Holding at roughly 19% of global transactions, it remains the second most used currency worldwide. That tells us foreign demand for the euro stays firm, even as digital alternatives grow louder on the sidelines. One of the reasons for this consistency lies within the stability of the euro area’s governing rules, economic coordination, and trust built up over time. Investors and institutions keep returning to the euro because they know what to expect — and surprises are scarce.

At the same time, central banks globally are buying gold at near-record levels. That in itself is a strong signal. When nations reach for gold, they tend to be preparing for shocks to the global financial system or reacting to distrust in cross-border dependencies. That shift tells us that traditional store-of-value preferences still dominate thinking at the state level. What this also means is that currencies not directly connected to geopolitical flashpoints or volatile policies may have an upper hand.

In the context of international settlements, there’s been movement toward avoiding legacy systems with broad Western influence. The precise tools taking shape vary by country, though the direction is clear — some economies are prioritising autonomy and strengthening local currency use in trade. These efforts are not necessarily pushing the euro out, but they are drawing thinner lines between who trades with whom, and in what currency.

Consequences Of Shifts In Invoicing Currencies

Most notably, the upheaval caused by the war in Ukraine has left a mark on how goods are priced and which currencies are used to settle them. We’ve seen a shift in invoicing away from familiar currencies in some trade corridors, especially those with closer ties to nations backing alternative payment models. This pattern has consequences, particularly when sanctions or threatened restrictions change perceived reliability.

For traders in options and futures, we can’t ignore the implications here. Shifts in invoicing currencies often come with a lag in market pricing. That lag can be an opportunity — or a hazard, depending on how leveraged your positioning happens to be. It’s also likely that implied volatility for contracts sensitive to commodity-linked invoices, particularly where the euro is involved, may not yet fully reflect these underlying shifts in trade finance. We’ve decided to give particular attention to commodities typically priced in dollars that are increasingly seeing settlement outside of that sphere. That’s where we expect pricing adjustments to surface.

Moreover, the gold trend changes how hedging strategies need to be framed. If official actors are building gold positions over fiat reserves, it might alter relative currency demand patterns in weeks ahead. We’ve started to model scenarios factoring such diversification into macro baskets. That alone suggests some cross-hedging involving the euro and bullion-based contracts could come under re-evaluation by funds shifting strategy from quarterly to monthly windows.

Another factor that bears watching is clearinghouse preference. When geopolitical factors change who trades with whom, it sometimes pushes counterparties into unfamiliar platforms. That will show up as higher margins or unexpected basis spreads, especially when euro-denominated exposure is layered into emerging market combinations. Margin shifts have lagged behind macro events in the past, but right now we’re watching that spread widen, especially on Eastern European currency pairs.

Our team’s current position focuses on stress-testing euro-linked exposure under changes to trade routes. We don’t treat the euro as fragile, but we do consider how its dominance could fragment at sector level — not across the board, but through exposures that lean more heavily on bilateral agreements outside the eurozone’s reach.

Immediately, we’re reviewing short-dated volatility surfaces for signs of tactical hedges by large currency holders. That often acts as an early warning — not of weakness per se, but of directional caution. We expect an uptick in gamma positioning around key commodity-linked pairs and lateral moves out of standard euro hedging baskets.

The headline figures in the article are steady, but under the surface we’re seeing movement that deserves close tracking. What matters now is how to position accordingly before those gradual signs take firmer shape in hard pricing. Keep an eye on the shorter end of the curve. And don’t ignore physical settlement adjustments that imply liquidity preferences are starting to lean elsewhere.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.