The US dollar is experiencing a decline in value across various currency pairs. USD/JPY has decreased by 0.5% to 145.40, while EUR/USD has risen by 0.3%, testing levels above 1.1600. The dollar had previously gained some strength due to safety flows from the Iran-Israel conflict, drawing back short positions.
With easing geopolitical tensions, there is an expectation of a more risk-on market mood, potentially reversing previous dollar positions. Recent Fed updates indicate a dovish shift, suggesting possible broader policy changes, putting downward pressure on the dollar. September has a 96% chance of a rate cut, according to market speculations.
Trade Policies And Economic Uncertainty
The diminishing geopolitical tensions refocus attention on trade policies. No substantial trade agreements have emerged, with a looming July deadline. Traders anticipate a delay in trade resolutions, expecting existing policies to remain unchanged. This inconsistency in policy contributes to uncertainties about the US economy and challenges in confidently predicting future outcomes.
This uncertainty has already impacted the dollar in the first half of the year, and similar effects are anticipated to continue. With regular market conditions resuming, the struggle for the dollar to maintain stability persists.
The earlier section points to a continuing downward move in the dollar as a direct result of both a softening in global political strain and the shifting tone from policymakers. By pointing to rate expectations into September, especially the implied probability of a cut at 96%, it’s clear that pricing is not speculative but heavily factored in by market participants.
Looking ahead, we’ll be focusing more closely on flows linked to interest rate differentials, especially now that the volatility from geopolitical risk has receded. Bloom’s prior strength in the dollar was underpinned by flight-to-safety behaviour during global tension flare-ups, pulling funds back into US assets. That unwind is now visible in the move away from the dollar against major pairs. Yen and euro in particular are reclaiming ground quickly—something we haven’t seen with quite this firmness since earlier in the year.
Trade Talks And Market Sentiment
With trade talks dragging on unresolved and a decisive agreement looking unlikely before July, what we’re left with is a vacuum of fresh direction that might otherwise support a dollar rebound. Tariff standoffs and inconsistent negotiating postures effectively flatten any optimism for a surprise policy shift. That stagnation isn’t simply a background concern—it’s another reason we’re seeing a reluctant dollar, hesitant to bounce despite earlier oversold conditions now unwinding on risk appetite.
What stands out is the dollar’s reduced capacity to draw in yield-seeking capital in the absence of hawkish signals. With recent Fed communications leaning openly towards accommodation, and real yields responding accordingly, the carry advantage is simply no longer as compelling.
As always, this sets the stage for positioning to be increasingly sensitive to small shifts in macro figures, especially inflation prints or labour data. If forward-looking data doesn’t correct upwards, the market will begin treating a rate cut as a base case, not a possibility. That will keep downside pressure on the dollar alive well into the start of Q3.
Volatility may remain compressed, but the broader direction has tilted. In earlier weeks, strength was driven less by fundamentals and more by market sentiment reacting to headlines—now, lacking that tailwind, strength has not only faded, it’s showing signs of reversal. Given the consistent repricing from swaps data and futures, we have reason to lean into this directional bias rather than fade it without cause.
Watching options flow through the next fortnight will be vital for gauging whether markets lean towards more aggressive downside setups in the dollar or remain cautiously rangebound. Either way, pricing in complacency would be premature. The next few sessions call for a flexible posture, but not an ambiguous one. Wide straddles may prove inefficient—leaner, directional exposure with appropriate hedging will likely fare better in a market realigning around confirmed policy paths rather than reacting to the unknown.