The Bank of Japan is releasing its quarterly Tankan report today. The report, an essential economic indicator, surveys numerous Japanese firms across industries about their current business conditions and future expectations.

The headline of the report is a diffusion index measuring the sentiment balance between optimistic and pessimistic firms. Policymakers are cautious about interest rate adjustments, possibly delaying hikes to maintain economic recovery.

Caixin S&P Global Manufacturing PMI

China’s second manufacturing PMI, the Caixin/S&P Global Manufacturing PMI for June, is being released today. Analysts predict a rise to 49.0 from May’s 48.3.

The NBS Manufacturing PMI, released yesterday, offers an official insight into large and state-owned enterprises. In contrast, the Caixin PMI focuses on smaller, private-sector enterprises, reflecting more market-driven dynamics.

The NBS PMI covers an extensive sample of around 3,000 enterprises and reflects sectors deeply affected by government policies. The Caixin PMI surveys around 500 enterprises and often highlights more volatility due to external economic conditions.

These PMIs together provide a comprehensive view of China’s diverse economic landscape. They capture both macroeconomic stability influenced by state policies and the microeconomic dynamics of market-driven sectors.

Tankan Report Analysis

The Tankan report arriving today will give a clearer view into the mindset of Japanese firms heading into the latter half of the year. It’s broken down into diffusion indices, which effectively capture whether more firms feel conditions are improving or worsening. A positive reading implies that a higher share of firms feel business has picked up, whereas a negative suggests broad pessimism. What’s important here is that the central bank’s current hesitation to commit fully to tighter policy suggests that sentiment from these businesses—especially manufacturing and nonmanufacturing majors—still holds considerable sway over when and how monetary adjustments might materialise.

The latest leanings suggest policymakers are not particularly keen to experiment with higher rates unless they’re sure business confidence won’t suffer. We should pay close attention to whether smaller firms, often more sensitive to cost pressures and global trends, echo the views of the industrial giants. If there is a marked contrast, that split could help us map out pressure points for future shifts in monetary stance. Reading between the lines, subdued optimism from firms may translate to firmer expectations that any shift in yield curve management might not arrive until early autumn at the earliest.

Meanwhile in China, the Caixin/S&P Global Manufacturing PMI could add texture to state-driven data released a day earlier. Now, this index, while narrower in coverage, has an outsized influence because it captures businesses that live or die by market movements rather than state-led support. Forecasts suggesting an uptick to 49.0 still leave the gauge below the neutral 50.0 mark—pointing to lingering contraction. But that slight easing in the rate of decline does offer some breathing room, especially after a weaker May.

What we need to grasp here is the contrast between the large, policy-sensitive firms picked up by the government’s NBS readings and the leaner, more nimble enterprises in this private-sector measure. If the Caixin PMI moves closer to positive territory, that suggests exporters and small manufacturers are coping better with headwinds than previously assumed. On the other hand, any undershooting would underline that costs, weak global demand, or domestic slack remain strong deterrents to recovery at the grassroots business level.

Given these readings, we could expect short-term rates to trade in tighter, more speculative ranges as markets digest the difference in health between these two regions. Fast money positioning may grow more sensitive to policy signals out of Tokyo, particularly if the Tankan indicates businesses are more comfortable with tightening than expected. Elsewhere, if the Caixin number manages surprise strength, that breathes some life into Chinese cyclical growth bets, which could rotatate capital into more risk-aligned trades.

Watching the spread between Chinese and Japanese recovery indicators gives us an edge in anticipating fund flows, especially as macro trading shifts from pure inflation themes towards capital discipline and earning strength. As output and survey data begins to diverge, so too will opportunities in medium-dated rate structures and volatility skews. We should stay nimble but with clear thresholds, especially within scenarios where firm sentiment might not match economic headline prints.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.