Michael Barr from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors addressed the New York Fed’s Small Business Credit Symposium, acknowledging that while the US economy appears stable, trade strategies from the Trump administration pose challenges.

High tariffs threaten US businesses, especially small ones, with potential risks. There is a concern that if supply chains are disrupted or businesses fail due to rising costs, it could lead to inflation.

Us Economy And Trade Policies

The US economy is currently showing resilience with inflation nearing 2%, but the trade policies have introduced uncertainties. A trade shock could particularly impact small businesses and lead to price hikes if supply chains falter or businesses collapse.

Barr’s comments underline a growing concern around the strain that certain policy shifts could place on smaller firms, particularly due to higher input costs caused by tariffs. From our standpoint, that’s relevant not simply because of the direct pressures on these businesses, but because they often contribute disproportionately to supply chain fluidity and job creation. If enough of them begin to feel the squeeze, we may find disruptions rippling outward.

To translate the implications for derivatives, pricing models may need adjusting if inflation expectations begin to rise again. Although consumer price data has recently moved closer to the 2% mark, that progress could reverse if cost-push inflation takes hold through higher import prices. We’re not just talking about the cost of goods, but also logistics and storage—areas that have tighter capacity, which derivatives contracts already factor into.

Those engaged in rate-sensitive strategies should be aware: even in the absence of headline CPI acceleration, the Federal Reserve may hold rates higher for longer if it suspects upcoming price pressure from trade frictions. Barr’s remarks, cautious as they may seem, point to a Fed keeping one eye on policy spillovers. Accordingly, curve plays that are predicated on imminent cuts may need rebalancing if consensus timing shifts.

Market Adjustments And Risk Parameters

What’s more, spreads across different durations could readjust if there’s an increased divergence between near-term inflation resilience and mid-term risk. This isn’t about panic positioning—but rather minor, sensible recalibrations. The recent stability in core inflation won’t necessarily stop TIPS breakevens from widening if input costs surge. That’s another variable our models are nudging us to monitor more closely.

Furthermore, high tariffs could dampen business investment. That, in turn, may affect growth expectations priced into equity index derivatives, particularly in small-cap sectors. These companies hold less bargaining power internationally and may have tighter profit margins exposed to commodity swings. If futures and options are tied too closely to forecasts ignoring such microeconomic stress points, traders could find themselves behind the move.

Given this, we’re adjusting our risk parameters modestly for positions tied to global trade exposure. While it’s not yet a hard tilt, the carry cost of ignoring this risk has begun nudging some implied volatilities higher on longer-dated contracts related to industrials and transport. That shift isn’t linear, but once liquidity moves behind these assumptions, repricing can be more abrupt than expected.

Barr isn’t positioning this messaging as a forecast, but as a caution. That hasn’t gone unnoticed by markets.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.