The Federal Reserve’s framework should be robust and adaptable to a variety of scenarios. It should prioritise maintaining 2% inflation without attempting to compensate for previous inflation shortfalls.

Attention should also be given to overshooting in terms of full employment, not merely employment levels. The Federal Reserve is urged to improve the communication of key risks, uncertainties, and policy responses.

Long Term Strategies

These theoretical considerations are not related to the current economic outlook. They focus on long-term structural strategies within the Federal Reserve’s mandate.

The above content outlines specific suggestions regarding how the Federal Reserve ought to structure its long-term approach to monetary policy. It suggests that the central bank should not aim to overcorrect for past inflation undershooting but rather keep its attention firmly fixed on maintaining the targeted 2% inflation rate moving forward. Also highlighted is the idea that the full implications of employment data, particularly when employment appears to overshoot its full potential, should receive more emphasis than merely watching headline figures. Finally, the call for clearer messaging touches on the need for more transparency about possible risks and how policy might shift in response.

In our view, the immediate implications are not tied to current rate expectations but do influence how we interpret medium-term positioning. The focus on inflation as an ongoing rather than backward-looking metric nudges us toward being more responsive to actual pricing data rather than lagging employment signals. If full employment persists beyond reasonable thresholds—where real wages or participation rates strain sustainability—this could raise alarm bells earlier than if the nominal unemployment rate alone were used.

That said, policy communication remains uneven. Expectations around future decisions may rest more on inferred sentiment than clear guidance. When central bank language stays generic, we’re left piecing together intent from smaller cues, which introduces volatility where there might otherwise be stability.

Monetary Policy Implications

Powell’s previous statements haven’t promised rate actions tethered to short-term moves in inflation; instead, they reflect a tendency to hold steady in the absence of convincing cumulative progress. Recent core pricing prints have cooled modestly, but they’re still at levels that would make precipitous policy reversals unlikely.

In pricing swaps and other rate-linked derivatives, recent reductions in implied volatility suggest some traders may have shifted from directional bets to more nuanced positioning. In that context, Jackson Hole’s tone prompted some Thursday rebalancing, but the volume wasn’t outsized. This decision-making pattern still reveals sensitivity to macro headlines, even in the face of muted moves in realised data.

We find ourselves assigning greater weight to that messaging gap. The lack of alignment between policy direction and how markets interpret it increases the appeal of calendar spreads or relative value opportunities farther along the curve. Breakeven levels continue to assume a reasonably anchored inflation profile, leaving options premium modest near term but more interesting further out, especially when considered around release windows or employment-heavy weeks.

Waller’s previous push for data-dependent patience and the caution on employment metrics reinforces the idea that rate cuts are not around the corner. The Committee appears unwilling to telegraph accommodation before there’s a convincing break in inflation performance. For near expiration positions, that may mean reduced probability of front-end shifts unless data meaningfully surprises.

In the coming fortnight, hedging structures skewed lightly bearish make more sense than fully directional calls. We’re more comfortable leaning into expressions that benefit from range-bound yields with optionality around inflection points, especially when scheduled releases like CPI or labour reports align with positioning pressure. The absence of abrupt pivots limits upside convexity, but relative positioning still can capture short-term mispricing.

Core PCE prints at the end of month will carry extra weight, but not because of one monthly figure—instead, it’s about whether trend consistency appears strong enough to justify any policy review. Until then, premiums should remain in line with recent averages, unless macro surprises hit either side of the Fed’s dual mandate harder than forecast.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.