Dominic LeBlanc, overseeing US-Canada trade, is optimistic about reaching a deal with the US. Initial hopes for an agreement by the G7 summit were unmet due to ongoing challenges, yet talks appear to be picking up pace.

LeBlanc remains aware of the substantial work required to finalise an agreement. The Canadian ambassador to Washington mentioned that the process continues, and highlighted a recent urgency in negotiations over the past two weeks. President Trump regards tariffs as a solution, adding complexity to discussions.

Diplomatic Efforts Accelerate

The comments from LeBlanc underscore a noticeable acceleration in diplomatic efforts. Though earlier ambitions of aligning talks with the G7 timeline did not materialise, the renewed push suggests that both sides are now more actively engaging in technical matters that had previously slowed progress. This shift in tempo isn’t just ceremonial—it hints at management-level coordination entering a more concentrated phase, with negotiators reviewing tariff frameworks, dispute resolution processes, and possibly sector-specific provisions such as agriculture or automotive content rules.

When the ambassador noted “urgency,” it revealed more than a change in tone. It pointed to actual calendar-driven deadlines surfacing behind closed doors. In this sort of climate, metrics like import flows, cross-border pricing mechanisms, and regional supply chains gain added weight. Tariff policy, particularly Trump’s long-held belief in using it as leverage, brings with it real adjustment pressure. This isn’t merely about positioning; it’s about prompting quick responses from counterparties who otherwise might delay.

For us in the derivatives space, this matters. Accelerated talks—and the market sensitivity around tariff decisions that may emerge from them—have a way of converting low-volatility assumptions into displacement risk. That risk can take different shapes: widening spreads in sectoral indices, reshaped basis expectations, or fluid implied volatilities triggered by trade-comment headlines. Even modest changes in North American trade schemes can rattle positioning models if underlying correlation structures are forced to reset.

Impact on Hedging and Contracts

That said, the pace of developments also gives clues. When political figures shift from calendar optimism to discussing urgency, they are telegraphing fewer hypotheticals and more binding timetables. This affects near-term hedging assumptions. When we consider structuring trades around this environment, it’s worth analysing not only raw exposure to manufacturing or energy path dependencies, but also how fast counterparties will re-rate pricing should cross-border processes tighten or open.

LeBlanc’s awareness of the workload ahead tells us that while optimism is valid, the architecture of any revised arrangement is still on the table. Those details will shape cost expectations and settlement terms for longer-dated contracts that need a stable baseline. We would do well to monitor indicators like customs data, transportation bottlenecks, or clearance backlogs in benchmark corridors—each of which can give on-the-ground clues about the direction of travel.

To that end, sudden moves in certain fixed-income vol regimes might precede headlines. It only takes one official to float a conditional concession or tariff reprieve for short-term interest rate curves to react, particularly when tied to trade-driven inflation estimates. But noise without rateable confirmation may increase positioning whipsaws. Our role here is to avoid anchoring on optimism and instead weigh the shape and velocity of incoming structural revisions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.