In April, the US experienced a trade balance improvement, despite declining imports and fluctuating currency values

    by VT Markets
    /
    Jun 5, 2025

    In April 2025, the US international trade balance stood at -61.6 billion USD, compared to the expected -70.0 billion USD. The previous trade balance was revised from -140.5 billion USD to -138.3 billion USD. The goods trade balance in April was -86.97 billion USD, a considerable improvement from March’s preliminary figure of -87.62 billion USD and prior value of -147.85 billion USD.

    Exports rose by 3.0% in April, contrasting with the 0.2% increase in the prior month. Imports plummeted by 16.3%, a sharp decline from a 4.4% rise previously. The largest ever trade balance in March occurred as imports surged ahead of planned tariffs. April’s drastic drop in imports, particularly in consumer goods such as pharmaceuticals, led to the trade balance’s recovery. Despite improvements, the trade balance only returned to levels seen in late 2023.

    Year To Date Deficit Increase

    The year-to-date goods and services deficit has increased by 179.3 billion USD, or 65.7%, compared to the same period in 2024. Meanwhile, the USD/JPY exchange rate shifted from 143.17 to 142.84 due to separate jobless claims data that affected the dollar negatively.

    That April’s trade balance came in better than forecast may seem encouraging at first glance. The gap narrowed to -61.6 billion USD, well under predictions, thanks in large part to a steep drop in import volumes. It should be noted that the previous month’s figure was also revised less negatively, albeit still substantial. At its root, this movement reflects more than routine monthly fluctuations — it points to a behaviour shift tied to external policy drivers.

    The prior surge in March imports was no accident. A large number of US importers appeared to front-load purchases in anticipation of further tariff changes, likely to avoid additional costs when regulatory tweaks took effect. This alone triggered an artificial bulge in the trade imbalance. Once that activity had cleared, April saw a sharp correction. It was not so much organic improvement, but rather digestion of March’s spike.

    We saw exports rise at the fastest monthly pace in over a year — up 3.0% — marking a strong reversal from March’s near-flat performance. From an analytical position, that points to steadier demand externally, or at least a clearing of earlier logistical bottlenecks. Still, the standout feature of the April data remains the plunge in imports, which dropped more than 16%, led by consumer-facing segments. Goods like pharmaceuticals often move in waves due to inventory planning; this decline hints at bloated March orders now winding down.

    Broader Market Implications

    The net result? While the monthly gap narrowed, it must be read in the context of sharp quarterly noise. For those of us navigating short-term directional bets tied to macro readings or FX pairings, April’s shift cannot yet be treated as a structural change in trade position.

    The underlying story across the year-to-date totals is far less benign. A 179.3 billion USD jump in the cumulative trade deficit, up more than 65% from the prior year, is not something to dismiss. That requires us to question how sustainable this pattern is if external demand weakens or domestic consumption remains high.

    Exchange rate shifts, particularly USD/JPY, ought to be weighed separately. The yen strengthened slightly as signs of softness in the US labour market filtered through. These jobless claims hinted at a small kink in the employment cycle, sapping momentum from the dollar at the margin.

    From a trading stance, our lens must remain fixed on how changing import patterns, front-loaded or delayed, impact broader supply flows. The timeline of these moves matters — misjudging the pace of rebalancing could leave positions exposed. More so when FX volatility couples with macro releases. Short-dated volatility near payroll reports or trade publications may now become more sensitive, more angular in response.

    We must treat the revised figures with disciplined caution and remember they mark levels last seen in 2023. If consumption patterns start to revert or further policy shifts create another front-loading cycle, then expectations around related asset classes should be dynamically recalibrated. Timing entries and exits based on backward-looking revisions risks overlooking microstructure shifts beneath the macros.

    Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

    see more

    Back To Top
    Chatbots