J.P. Morgan cautions that an escalation leading to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices to between $120 and $130. Goldman Sachs notes a $10 per barrel geopolitical risk premium in current prices. Barclays forecasts $85 oil if Iranian exports are halved, with prices exceeding $100 in the event of a broader regional conflict.

Short Term Fragility And Market Adjustments

What the earlier sections highlight is a blend of short-term fragility and capacity for adjustment in the oil market. Prices are already being influenced not just by supply fears but by the expectation of disruption, most of which is being priced in on speculation that may or may not materialise. Brent crude’s recent lift can thus be tied less to actual losses in output and more to the perceived likelihood of those losses. The possibility of a few hundred thousand barrels going offline is comparatively modest in historical terms, but it matters here because of where that oil comes from and how easy—or hard—it might be to replace.

What’s worth noting is that the bulk of output from Iran still flows, despite sanctions, through less visible channels, and any change to that would not go unnoticed. That’s why the forecasts diverge. Some reckon a tapering off in exports may already be happening underforce, which tempers expectations of a larger shock moving forward. Others, more wary, envision additional losses tied to escalation, even if speculative in nature. The true effect, however, hinges on duration. A short delay, say a few weeks, may bump prices temporarily but leave broader fundamentals intact. A drawn-out halt, by contrast, reshuffles the equation entirely.

There’s also ample reminder that physical bottlenecks—like a blockage at Hormuz—don’t tend to last forever. History has shown us choke points can be bypassed or reopened under pressure. Traders can take some comfort in knowing that large producers usually respond to surging prices by leaning on reserves or raising output. That said, reaction time matters, and any lag creates opportunities, or risks, depending on which side of the book you’re on.

Role Of Managed Money And Market Reactions

From our view, if disruptions do stretch into months rather than weeks, the market won’t wait for confirmation—it will run ahead. There’s little room for indecision in that moment. Spreads are one useful barometer. Keep a close eye on time spreads between nearby and deferred contracts; widening gaps indicate supply fears building. Those movements can be sharper and noisier in times of geopolitical stress. Volatility, too, becomes less episodic and more structural under these conditions. It’s not just about the level of price—it’s about how stubborn price becomes in the face of fluctuating newsflows.

What the discussion also shows is that not all disruption scenarios are priced the same. Supply declines out of Iran are impactful, but they move the dial differently depending on whether OPEC steps in, or importers switch sources quickly enough. Demand adjustments out of Asia—especially from China—dampen the effect somewhat. But that’s assuming no domino effect through neighbouring countries, whose output and transit volumes are higher. The moment the risk spreads geographically, so too does the pricing effect; hence some estimates touching the $120–$130 range.

What stands out is how much of the current premium ties back to risk appetite. When expectations vary this widely, price action becomes an expression of positioning, not just fundamentals. As such, it may be helpful for us to pay close attention not only to the headlines but to how markets respond to them. If prices rise on information already known, that tells us participation is unbalanced. If, instead, prices fall despite new risks, it signals exhaustion or overextension.

Eventually, optionality becomes central. Weekly option flows, changes in open interest, and the shape of the implied curve all offer clues to what the market fears and when. We’ve seen in past tensions that certain expiry dates attract large flows, protecting or betting on particular windows of dislocation. That kind of behaviour often drives sharp intraday moves, as hedges build or vanish quickly.

Lastly, do not discount the role of managed money—positions held by funds often shift ahead of clarity, as models trigger rebalancing or stop-losses get breached. These create temporary dislocations that can exaggerate moves. Watching those flows closely allows anticipation of markets becoming one-directional, if only briefly, particularly on thinner trading days.

So, while near-term oil pricing may not rest entirely on actual volumes lost just yet, the weeks ahead carry more weight on headline interpretation, timing of hedging activity, and relative changes in positioning than on barrels alone. The market is alert, yes, but also prone to overstretch its reactions—and that may be where the edge lies.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.