Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported first-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of 81 cents, surpassing the 73 cents expected. This represented an increase from the previous year’s 51 cents, due to higher realised natural gas and oil prices.
Total revenues rose to $7.6 billion, exceeding the expected $6.8 billion, driven by increased product sales. They have declared a dividend of 58.75 Canadian cents per share, payable on July 3, 2025, continuing a 25-year trend of dividend growth at an annual rate of 21%.
In the quarter, Canadian Natural returned C$1.7 billion to shareholders, including C$1.2 billion in dividends and C$0.5 billion from share repurchases. The company reported net earnings of C$2.5 billion, with adjusted net earnings from operations at C$2.4 billion.
Production Performance
Production reached 1,582,348 Boe/D, a rise of 18.7% from the prior year, surpassing projections. Oil and NGL output increased to 1,173,804 Bbl/d, while natural gas volumes hit 2,451 MMcf/d.
Natural gas prices rose 22.7%, with oil and NGL prices up 14%. Total expenses increased to C$7.8 billion due to higher production and operational costs.
Cheniere Energy reported a first-quarter profit of $1.57 per share, missing expectations, due to increased costs. TechnipFMC and Baker Hughes saw mixed results, with varying impacts on revenues and profits.
The earlier figures point to a clear outperformance by Canadian Natural Resources Limited. Their adjusted earnings per share came in well above estimates, marking a strong comparison to last year’s quarter—specifically, an increase from 51 cents to 81 cents. From a trading perspective, this reflects healthier operational leverage borne out of firmer energy prices and unexpectedly high production volumes. The near 19% jump in production wouldn’t typically occur in a quarter unless backed by reliably strong fundamentals or long-term capacity investment, suggesting they’re not operating at temporary highs.
Revenue and Growth Analysis
Revenue of $7.6 billion, higher than forecasted, reaffirms that this isn’t simply a function of favourable commodity pricing but also the result of actual sales strength. When accounting for both price gains—nearly 23% in gas and 14% in liquids—and volumes, it’s easier to understand how top-line growth has outpaced expectations. The dividend, rising again with over two decades of steady increases, combined with substantial shareholder returns in the form of buybacks, speaks to capital discipline and the priority placed on cash distributions.
Operationally, expenses scaling up to C$7.8 billion deserves attention. This cost expansion isn’t unexpected given the rising production and supporting infrastructure activities, yet it hasn’t materially dented earnings growth. The adjusted net profit from operations, standing just below the headline net earnings, shows good accounting clarity, signalling minimal reliance on non-recurring items to boost results.
By contrast, other industry entrants are delivering less convincing data. Cheniere’s miss—driven by cost pressure—serves as a reminder that not all names are positioned to take full advantage of pricing upswings. Meanwhile, mixed reports from both TechnipFMC and Baker Hughes suggest that services and equipment names might be under more margin strain or navigating uneven contract cycles.
The disparity among these results implies that performance is being driven less by sector-wide factors and more by balance sheet strength and cost control. It’s worth noting that while Canadian Natural is now benefitting from legacy investments and steady pricing, others are showing the effects of past volatility, particularly where exposure to liquefied natural gas or cyclical service contracts is high.
To navigate the coming weeks, the data encourage us to pay close attention to operational leverage thresholds. Where output outpaces guidance and is paired with stable cost tolerance, it tends to provide opportunities, especially when buybacks and dividend streams are maintained or growing. The variation in peer outcomes also reinforces the need to evaluate cost profiles and asset positioning closely before anticipating price reactions. Price gains in energy don’t automatically translate into earnings momentum unless they coincide with output flexibility and financial efficiency.