Kazakhstan is maintaining higher than agreed oil production levels and does not plan to reduce output in May. The Kazakh Energy Ministry reports that daily production, including condensates, is expected to be 277 thousand tons, similar to April’s output.
In March, production was at 260 thousand tons per day, amounting to more than 2 million barrels daily in April and May. Condensates make up approximately 260 thousand barrels per day, indicating crude oil production is around 1.75 million barrels daily.
Production Levels and Future Implications
The agreed ceiling for May would be exceeded by about 300 thousand barrels per day if compensatory cuts are not considered. This situation may lead Saudi Arabia to advocate for increased oil production in July, posing further risks to oil prices.
The data confirms Kazakhstan’s intention to stay above its assigned target for oil output, with no plans to pull back in May. Daily production—factoring in both crude oil and lighter condensates—is holding steady at roughly 277 thousand tonnes, matching the April rate. This figure translates into a little over 2 million barrels per day, split between about 260 thousand barrels of condensates, and the remainder being crude oil. What this means is that Kazakhstan is currently yielding around 1.75 million barrels of crude each day.
Now, according to the limits set under the broader producer agreement, their ceiling for May would place them roughly 300 thousand barrels per day above quota—unless they offset it with future reductions, often referred to as compensatory cuts. There is, however, no clear movement yet in that direction.
This discrepancy places added weight on upcoming discussions among broader producer groups. One of the larger producers, Saudi Arabia, could interpret this divergence as license to push for more generous output allowances beginning in July. Such thinking might not be universally accepted, but from their perspective, if others are not sticking tightly to limits, there’s more flexibility at play than previously acknowledged.
Market Reactions and Strategic Positioning
For traders in derivatives linked to crude benchmarks, this is another tilt in the balance of supply expectations. When market participants observe one key member raising output without firm consequence, it sets a precedent that others may follow or view as leverage. We must be alert to the rhythm of these signals, as they influence near-term volatility and shape hedging decisions.
Prices could come under added pressure if Saudi Arabia’s support for increasing production finds traction among allies. Some may argue that rising supply should coincide with strong demand fundamentals, but those metrics are not aligned at present. Demand forecasts, while still growing, remain modest and uneven by region. China’s draw on imports has been slowing, and stockpiles in the U.S. are not falling as swiftly as some expected.
For those of us following backwardation or contango movements in the futures curve, it’s worth watching how traders interpret these possible supply shifts. Widening spreads between front and later months could reflect softening near-term demand or expectations of supply outpacing consumption. Any sudden reversals there may suggest repositioning is unfolding.
Putting it simply, inaction on output restraint from Kazakhstan nudges the rest of the group into a more delicate spot. If enforcement of limits is seen as weak or inconsistent, that may force reassessment of strategic positions. We’re entering a stretch where each country’s actions are being weighed more heavily, not only in physical flows but also in pricing structures across derivatives markets. Those exposed to these movements need to stay nimble, but more than that, they must be decisive when key shifts become clear.