Bessent expresses optimism about easing US-China tariffs, ensuring a steady magnet supply while maintaining current rates

    by VT Markets
    /
    Jun 27, 2025

    The US Treasury Secretary conveyed optimism about a new agreement with China, enabling the steady supply of magnets to past recipients. Despite this progress, a 20% tariff on fentanyl imports from China remains in effect.

    Current tariffs stand at 30% from the US to China and 10% vice versa. The date of August 12 is mentioned as a potential point for tariff adjustments. The intention is to maintain control over this de-escalation and avoid economic separation from China.

    Market Response To Tariffs

    The market has seemingly disregarded the tariff issues for quite some time now. It is expected that the tariffs on China may stabilise around the current levels or possibly decrease slightly, while other tariffs will persist at 10%.

    What the current text outlines is a developing tone of measured optimism from senior American officials regarding trade relations with China. The resumption of magnet supplies suggests supply chain concerns, at least in part, are being addressed. However, the persistence of punitive fentanyl-related tariffs indicates that some areas remain politically charged. The distinction between political tensions and commercial collaboration is becoming clearer, with room for cautious optimism—but this is no green light to overextend long-term positioning.

    With tariffs from the US at 30% and a return of 10% coming the other way, we’re sitting amid asymmetry. The mention of 12 August as a possible pivot implies that negotiations remain in motion. If that date is met with a change, it would likely be framed as a controlled recalibration rather than a sweeping shift. Market pricing seems to reflect that expectation. After all, if the broader market isn’t adjusting valuations based on tariff risk, it’s because there is reasonable confidence that no sudden escalation will take root.


    Now, considering how this might influence behaviour over the next few weeks, it seems fair to assume that some reversion to technicals could resume dominance, especially if macro data doesn’t inject new volatility. Positioning too early for a directional move tied purely to tariff realignment would not be backed by what we know today. A period of range-bound movements may not only be likely but also worth adapting to. Trade setups should factor in low convexity unless we see fresh headline risk.

    Trade Stability And Strategic Positioning

    Yellen’s tone cues a desire for predictability in the trade sphere. The implications for future policy decisions are not open-ended. There is a leaning toward balance—maintaining enough pressure to satisfy domestic interests while recognising the practical need to keep goods moving across borders. This tempers the risk of shock.

    For now, pricing derivatives as if tariffs will remain more or less steady with room for incremental easing seems the most realistic route. Positioning towards that consensus appears prudent unless new information breaks that mould. That doesn’t mean the opportunity is gone—it means we need to be more precise about where time decay hurts versus where asymmetrical upside remains. We might find pockets where supply chain restoration introduces volatility at the micro level, particularly if specific firms disclose adjustments in sourcing or cost.

    Keep a close eye on trade-weighted indexes and any material deviation in implied volatility across baskets that are China-sensitive. Those could offer the first practical hints of policy shift before even a press release is issued. Modest divergence between realised and implied could be all some need to rotate back into spreads with leaner exposure.

    In the meantime, the focus shifts slightly to correlation calibration. Those still holding legacy hedges might want to revisit their sensitivities and consider if short gamma exposure is still doing what it was built to do two months ago. With fewer abrupt surprises in this space, the cost-to-carry trade gains relevance.

    Trade perspectives, at least through the 12 August reference, should reflect a posture of constraint rather than credibility testing. There’s more value in reading between the stories than in acting on discrete headlines.


    Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

    see more

    Back To Top
    Chatbots