A national security meeting led by Trump lasted over an hour, discussing a potential strike on Iran. The gathering included varied perspectives, indicating diverse opinions among the participants.

While details of the meeting remain undisclosed, it suggests the US is approaching a decision regarding its actions towards Iran. The outcome of such decisions could have various implications on an international scale.

Internal Dynamics Within The Administration

The meeting underscores the tension between hawkish and dovish stances within the US administration. The final decision has yet to be made, implying ongoing deliberations and careful considerations.

The current scenario points toward heightened decision-making pressure within the United States administration, with differing voices surfacing more openly. Hawks appear to be pressing for immediate action, whereas others are urging a more measured path, advocating patience and re-evaluation of intelligence. The fact that this meeting extended beyond an hour not only implies a seriousness to the nature of the issues at hand, but also a lack of consensus, which often interferes with clear policy direction.

These internal disagreements do little to stabilise expectations among market participants who are looking for clarity. Remarks from Pompeo and Esper in days prior have leaned more assertively–leaning towards escalation under specific conditions. In contrast, Milley’s recent tone, while firm, has been pointedly careful not to signal any immediate moves. Such divergent guidance cannot be ignored in our positioning and risk assessment strategies.

Navigating Volatility And Strategic Adjustments

When decision-makers operate under uncertainty and conflicting advice, timelines elongate and the potential for sharp, inflection-point-type events naturally increases. This creates a window where cautious recalibration and staggering of positions will help moderate exposure to intraday surprises. It is far safer to assume that volatility, rather than direction, will lead price action in the near term.

Rather than speculating on the ultimate outcome of US intentions, we adjust by scrutinising the frequency and tone of public briefings. These often shift before action occurs, and changes in language speak louder than rehearsed statements. Any abrupt increase in activity at regional bases or heightened appearances by key military figures on the media schedule would require a quick evaluation of hedges. We’ve seen similar pre-action signalling before. It almost always begins with increased briefings, followed by PR containment attempts.

For anyone engaged in directional exposure, directional bias should be kept minimal–with a preference for strategies that gain from realised volatility. Given the stretched lead-times between decision and delivery, it would be a mistake to set medium-dated exposures with confidence.

We remain attentive, not to the headlines themselves, but to the pacing and proximity of updates. Traders will understand that a single official photo or short press comment, if timed wrong, can shift vol curves disproportionately versus their fundamental implication. Best to stay anchored with wide risk tolerances during such phases, and wait for tighter information loops to reappear before reacting to broader macro shifts.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.