The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) might implement further measures in late 2025, potentially reducing the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) if deemed necessary. This action aims to sustain long-term liquidity and maintain ample liquidity throughout mid and late 2025, fostering a supportive monetary environment for economic recovery.

Recently, the PBOC added approximately RMB1 trillion to the market through an RRR cut. The RRR mandates banks’ minimum reserves against deposit liabilities. In China, the PBOC controls this ratio, influencing banks’ lending power. Raising the RRR limits money supply as banks need to hold more in reserve, while lowering it allows banks to increase lending, boosting the money supply and potentially spurring economic activity.

Monetary Policy Implications

In effect, what the central bank did here was release lending capacity into the system. By reducing the reserve requirement—the portion of customer deposits banks must keep on hand—it has freed up capital. Banks can now lend more, circulating additional funds into the Chinese economy. It is not a direct cash injection, but a calculated way to make credit more accessible without resorting to expansive fiscal measures.

This type of policy often signals an intention to guide broader sentiment. When reserve levels are loosened in this way, it tends to be a response to weaker growth indicators or internal imbalances that require modest intervention rather than dramatic reform. The timing suggests a desire to smooth liquidity conditions before potential stress points in the second half of the year. The idea is to pre-empt a tightening in credit markets by giving banks latitude now, not in reaction to a problem later.

For us watching from a derivatives perspective, these signals matter a great deal. Typically, when central banks loosen the reserve requirement, bond yields can experience mild downward pressure. Changes in forward rates, particularly in yuan-based interest rate futures, may begin to price in reduced borrowing costs. Volatility, for now, remains relatively contained on short-end contracts, but there’s growing asymmetry further along the curve.

Market Reactions And Consequences

Zhou’s earlier comments about prioritising “reasonably ample” liquidity underline the methodical approach being taken. There’s no urgency to flood the markets, simply a preference to provide oxygen to the right parts of the financial system as needed. That should prompt a reassessment of short vol positions, especially across longer-dated interest rate optionality. We’ve noticed increasingly directional skew developing since the start of the quarter.

Looking ahead, those of us modelling liquidity metrics should also give more weight to potential phantom tightening—where liquidity appears stable on paper, but interbank lending and repo market signals deteriorate. That creeping dynamic has been observed before, especially when modest easing masks deeper structural pressures. Over-hedging against immediate rate cuts may prove inefficient, but building layered protection against a shift in slope seems more prudent.

Finally, the sheer scale of the last injection brings some clarity. A round figure like RMB1 trillion has a psychological effect on traders. It suggests a willingness to act in size, possibly again. That creates an anchor for policy expectations, which in practice reduces the unpredictability of short-term rates. What’s less obvious is how much that filters through to private credit extensions or risk sentiment.

We’re already seeing the effect in local funding curves. As spreads tighten between state and commercial lenders, cross-asset volatility correlations are drifting lower. That’s a modestly supportive signal for carry structures, though duration exposure needs to be watched carefully.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.