China will convene a National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee meeting from June 24 to 27 to review anti-competition law. Discussions may also cover Trump tariffs and Middle East issues.

The NPC Standing Committee is the permanent legislative body of the NPC, China’s top legislative authority. Unlike the full NPC, which gathers annually in March, the Standing Committee meets every few months and conducts legislative activities year-round.

Composition and Duties of the Committee

The committee comprises approximately 170–180 members, including the NPC Chairman, Vice-Chairpersons, and Secretary-General. Its duties involve passing laws when the full NPC is not in session, amending existing laws, and approving major administrative appointments like ministers or central bank officials.

Additionally, the committee reviews international treaties and oversees various state organs, such as the State Council (cabinet), courts, and prosecutors. By fulfilling these roles, the NPC Standing Committee plays a pivotal part in shaping China’s legislative framework and governance.

This article outlines the timing and function of the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee and flags that the upcoming session may consider issues stretching well beyond domestic legislation. These include a review of anti-monopoly laws and, notably, deliberations around U.S. tariff policy—specifically the import levies implemented during the previous administration—as well as political developments in the Middle East. With policymaking in China often taking a layered and technically opaque form, the mention of such topics at the committee level is a solid indication that these subjects are regarded with priority by Beijing.

The Role of the NPC Standing Committee

The NPC Standing Committee, unlike the broader NPC which is more ceremonial in nature and only convenes once a year, acts as China’s main legislative organ on a day-to-day basis. Possessing the authority to modify or introduce laws between sessions, it also frequently rubber-stamps appointments and ratifies important treaties. The committee doesn’t serve solely as a legislative engine in the Western sense but as a formalised vehicle enabling core directives from party leadership to be enacted without delay. That includes decisions with the capacity to impact global economic channels.

From our point of view, what stands out is that the scope of the June meeting is not limited to internal legal fine-tuning. Instead, it widens to external dynamics that closely affect sentiment in rates, trade-linked commodity structures, and the broader macro risk premium. The inclusion of so-called “Trump-era tariffs” sends a clear signal—it points to a recalibration of China’s stance on cross-border trade tension management, possibly in anticipation of electoral outcomes or ahead of anticipated policy shifts in Washington. We’re not looking at speculation either; for Beijing to elevate these matters at the Standing Committee level means preparatory steps are already well under way.

That makes the next few weeks particularly sensitive, not from the standpoint of headlines, but through the lens of pricing pathways for inflation hedges, duration exposure, and certain currency base correlations. Positions involving long-term assumptions on energy pricing or trade-sensitive flows could see unexpected movement should language around external tariffs become explicit. Even if a rollback isn’t announced, a framework for potential revision could be read as directional. Simply put, if easing signals are interpreted by global traders as credible, unwind on defensive positioning may follow swiftly.

Wang, Li, and their colleagues in the committee are not dealing in hypotheticals. The way previous Standing Committee agenda items were sequenced suggests planned follow-through, often in the months directly afterward. Participants in interest-rate derived exposures should therefore be watching for any structural references to import timing thresholds and retaliation clauses. These details can carry an underappreciated influence on breakeven spreads and even synthetic basis activity, especially in cross-strategy options.

On another front, the mention of Middle East issues—while less explicitly defined—adds a geopolitical layer that can’t be sidelined by those modelling volatility bands. We’re not just skimming headlines for risk-on and risk-off cues here. The committee’s docket likely includes alignment efforts that could affect outbound infrastructure lending or broader Belt and Road portfolio shifts. That, in turn, has knock-on effects for emerging markets correlation assumptions, particularly in sovereign CDS curves and oil demand growth projections.

Within this policy environment, careful sellers of convexity and those holding exposure to Asian basis swaps might consider rebalancing, leaning marginally neutral into the meeting. It isn’t yet a context for directional conviction, but forward vol markets in rates and FX are expected to reshape at the margin. Many are already flattening their curve sensitivities ahead of clarity due to the way policy fluidity in Beijing often precedes regional registrar adjustments, especially in Singapore and Hong Kong.

As for the anti-monopoly law revision, it’s more than just dry governance reform. This strand is directly tied to how consumer tech, industrial services, and supply chain platforms are permitted to price, scale, and access funding. It speaks to margins. Thus it affects valuation techniques for structured products and volatility skews in dual-listed counters. If Beijing incorporates cross-border elements or broadcaster limitations, this could hinder rerating narratives in export-heavy sectors.

For those of us handling term-structure ambiguity and gamma balancing around China-linked instruments, the key isn’t forecasting what will be legislated. It’s catching the language that hints at pacing and direction. There’s rarely fire without slow-burning smoke in this domain. So if phrases around systemic fairness, third-party compliance, or enforcement timelines arise, we’d mark that down for Q3 positioning strategy.

We’ve seen how prior committee meetings, often deemed procedural, become upstream triggers for policy reallocation themes globally. That pattern is unlikely to deviate here. Traders should pay attention not just to the outcomes but to the sequencing and framing of issues. This will be a week that informs more than it concludes.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.