{"id":21746,"date":"2025-05-09T15:15:57","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T15:15:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/uncategorized\/according-to-bessent-trump-prefers-an-80-tariff-on-china-differing-from-previous-lower-reports\/"},"modified":"2025-05-09T15:15:57","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T15:15:57","slug":"according-to-bessent-trump-prefers-an-80-tariff-on-china-differing-from-previous-lower-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/live-updates\/according-to-bessent-trump-prefers-an-80-tariff-on-china-differing-from-previous-lower-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"According to Bessent, Trump prefers an 80% tariff on China, differing from previous lower reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a recent statement, Trump suggested an 80% tariff on China might be appropriate. This contrasts with earlier reports, which indicated the US might reduce tariffs to 50-54%.<\/p>\n<p>The decision rests with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who leads trade negotiations with China. This sentiment suggests a more assertive stance in trade discussions.<\/p>\n<h3>Trump&#8217;s Comment on Tariff Level<\/h3>\n<p>That comment\u2014an 80 percent tariff\u2014sits markedly above the previously floated reduction level of around 50 to 54 percent. When juxtaposed, the shift hints at a sharpened posture. While the earlier figures suggested a tempered easing of existing trade levies, recent talk from the former president pushes in the opposite direction entirely.<\/p>\n<p>Bessent finds himself in a difficult position. On one hand, there\u2019s pressure to maintain a hard line, possibly to preserve political appeal or negotiation leverage. On the other, market stability and international relationships hang in the balance. A move as steep as 80 percent could trigger retaliation, heighten import costs and weigh on supply chain continuity\u2014especially in technology and consumer goods.<\/p>\n<p>From a trading perspective, we interpret such rhetoric as not yet policy, but nonetheless worthy of close tracking. Responses in futures pricing and the CNY\/USD forward curve already hint that risk is being priced differently, albeit moderately for now. Volatility has edged up in relevant sectors.<\/p>\n<p>Focus has narrowed on consumer electronics, industrials and semi-finished goods\u2014imports heavily sensitive to tariff fluctuations. If Bessent leans closer to the former president\u2019s position, the implied pressure on Asian manufacturing output and input costs would rise quickly. That would not stay confined stateside.<\/p>\n<h3>Market Reactions and Impacts<\/h3>\n<p>As we run through scenario modelling, it\u2019s not just spot impacts we\u2019re watching. Options positioning on major indices has already begun adjusting. There&#8217;s been net premium gain in OTM puts for SPY and NDX, while implied correlation has ticked up across sector ETFs. The defensive redo isn\u2019t wholesale yet, but it suggests hedges are being renewed. Near-dated options in particular have grown disproportionately more expensive.<\/p>\n<p>From a pricing perspective, base-case assumptions on policymaking timelines may need compressing. We thought the tariff debate would play out over two quarters. That may accelerate. The unofficial positioning of Bessent as final arbiter\u2014at least for now\u2014means that liquidity spikes could emerge around unscheduled statements or leaks from the Treasury. We\u2019ve seen that pattern establish before.<\/p>\n<p>Where implied vol is underestimating the risk, skew is offering partial cover\u2014but less so as demand drifts further out on the curve. Equities linked directly to exporters are not fully dislocated yet, and that disconnect rarely lasts long. Watch proxy exposures as well in commodities and EM FX. Copper has been particularly reactive to China dialogue in prior cycles.<\/p>\n<p>Any whiff of a retaliatory stance from Beijing would shift outcomes further from consensus. There\u2019s no indication so far, but that doesn\u2019t mean we can lean on assumptions made three or four weeks ago. Sensitivities aren\u2019t theoretical here\u2014they impact pricing flow directly.<\/p>\n<p>Delay in tariff policy clarification forces us to rotate towards shorter-dated derivatives, keeping duration deliberately reduced until position density and headline risk abate. There\u2019s usefulness in staying agile. Directional conviction isn\u2019t premature, but patience on size is essential.<\/p>\n<p>We track correlation clusters across asset classes to avoid over-hedging regions of the book where overlap exaggerates exposure. Think carefully about where you sit in the risk transmission chain. Even modest shifts in trade policy language have triggered revaluations of credit risk in Asian corporates tied to exports. Multiple desks are paring long carry trades in emerging markets.<\/p>\n<p>While headlines may fluctuate, action in derivative volumes gives us better ground truth. Watch delta hedging activity in indices and large tech names over the next two weeks\u2014it\u2019s a better signal for aggregate viewpoint than the front page. Sometimes clarity arrives first through the order book, not a podium.<\/p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/trade-now\/\">Create your live VT Markets account<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/myaccount.vtmarkets.com\/login\">start trading<\/a>\u00a0now. <\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trump proposes 80% China tariff, signaling tougher trade stance; contrasts with earlier 50-54% reduction reports.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":17023,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-live-updates"],"acf":{"acf_article_selection_author":null},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21746\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vtmarkets.com\/en-eu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}