In May, durable goods orders in the United States, excluding transportation, increased by 0.5%. This figure surpassed prior expectations, which had anticipated no change.
This data may indicate economic activity in sectors not reliant on transportation. A rise in orders can suggest demand for these goods is growing.
Understanding Durable Goods
Durable goods are items intended to last at least three years. This category encompasses machinery, appliances, and other long-lasting products.
Separating transport-related orders gives insight into core industrial demand. The transport sector can be volatile and might skew figures.
What this data tells us is fairly straightforward, but it’s what it implies that merits our attention. The rise of 0.5% in durable goods orders, excluding transportation, points to healthier demand in sectors underpinned by more stable industrial activity. It’s not a monumental increase, yet it’s more than what had been expected. And whenever actual results deviate from forecasts in this direction, it’s worth paying close attention.
The reasoning behind excluding transportation equipment is simple: orders for aeroplanes and large vehicles tend to be erratic. Including those can distort month-to-month movements. By stripping them out, we get a clearer line of sight on what’s happening with capital equipment, machinery, tools—items often bought by companies when they feel confident enough to invest.
For us, this increase in core goods ordering suggests firms are still spending on future production capacity. That, in turn, is often linked to expectations of steady or growing demand—evidence of underlying stability in the business environment. It’s not just noise from one-off transport deals or fleet orders.
Impact on Monetary Policy
Now, although this figure alone doesn’t carry weight for monetary policy moves on its own, it’s the kind of measure that Fed officials watch as part of a broader picture. If such numbers persist, they tilt the probability scale regarding expectations for interest rate paths. We’ve seen how sticky inflation and relatively tight labour conditions have allowed the Fed to remain cautious. So, stronger-than-projected industrial numbers may delay hopes of looser policy.
From a strategy perspective, we could interpret this resilience in capital expenditure as support for stronger equity-linked instruments or spreads sensitive to macroeconomic surprises. The short end may remain volatile, but it becomes harder to construct a dovish narrative when such data continues to edge upward beyond prior forecasts.
It may also push implied volatility in certain rate markets, depending on how traders recalibrate expectations for economic slowdowns or soft landings. If these messages are reinforced across subsequent releases, especially ISM and payroll trends, then existing rate positioning will become harder to justify.
For now, those of us active in rate derivatives and curve structures might find it more constructive to lean towards expressions that remain resilient against further postponements of easing cycles. The data hasn’t flipped any major themes, but it does nudge sentiment in favour of a more balanced or cautious stance. Confidence in sustained demand isn’t fading quite as quickly as anticipated.