Iran and the US have engaged in direct talks, with US special envoy Steve Witkoff speaking several times by phone with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi. These discussions follow Israel’s recent strikes on Iran, according to Reuters.

The report has impacted the oil market, with prices now at $74.82, experiencing an increase of $1.32. Araqchi stated that Tehran would not resume negotiations unless Israel ceased its attacks.

Washington initiated the initial call and put forward a new proposition to resolve the stalemate over differing red lines. Current developments suggest both ongoing conflicts and the potential for a swift resolution.

Direct Communications Between United States And Iran

The article describes a series of direct communications between the United States and Iran following reported Israeli strikes. From what we gather, Witkoff placed several calls to Araqchi, which indicates a distinct shift in diplomatic methods, especially with tensions high and public positions previously entrenched. Tehran has made it clear that future talks remain off the table unless Israel halts all military operations. That statement alone introduces a rigid precondition, suggesting that the diplomatic route may stumble again just as quickly.

Meanwhile, Washington appears to have adopted a more active tone, initiating discussions and offering what’s described as a “new proposition.” Though details remain sparse, it’s apparent that this attempt aims to dismantle old sticking points, perhaps by redefining previous lines of disagreement rather than reinforcing them. There is a suggestion here that something more flexible may be on the table than in earlier rounds, possibly a practical compromise rather than ideological alignment.

With this backdrop, we see global oil prices responding right away — jumping to $74.82, up $1.32 — which reflects heightened concern around supply chains or potential disruption, rather than sheer speculation. This move is not excessive but noticeable, hinting that energy markets are weighing these talks with cautious interest, rather than betting on either escalation or de-escalation just yet.

Market Hesitation And Strategic Positioning

For ourselves, that signals something pretty direct: price action is starting to acknowledge the possibility of meaningful change in the region. When that happens, implied volatility often picks up, especially around crude-linked assets and currencies resting on energy imports or exports. We’d expect contracts tied to Brent or WTI to continue showing sensitive forward curves. Watch the two-month skew – if risk-on sentiment gains traction, you’ll likely see some softening in downside protection.

It would be prudent to consider options with rolling expiries across near-term dates. If we’re sitting on straddles or strangles, repositioning for directional bias may not yet be justified — the headline flow can still whipsaw sharply in either direction. However, put-call ratios should be reviewed frequently, particularly as they often lead futures volumes when fundamentals remain entangled with geopolitics.

Given Tehran’s precondition, we’d also prepare for a period in which results move slower than expectations. That mismatch tends to create temporary price dislocations, which offer short-term inefficiencies in futures spreads and gamma trades. Price gaps like that aren’t stable long — they close swiftly once headlines shift again, but fast hands usually benefit the most.

We’re seeing the mechanics of market hesitation but no hard pivot. And that leaves a narrow but defined window for positioning ahead of further clarity. For now, delta hedging strategies should remain slightly loose, and covered calls may need fresh evaluation if oil begins forming a tight channel.

It’s not about betting on calm or chaos. It’s reading when the market starts adjusting its assumptions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.