The current tariffs on China risk causing a combination of higher consumer prices and slower economic growth. The increased tariffs are three to five times higher than before, leading to a stagflationary effect on the economy. This situation is not without cost to the economy, affecting growth and causing prices to rise.

Businesses are hesitant to make large investments due to the uncertainty surrounding tariff negotiations. The US and China have acknowledged that these agreements are temporary and subject to change, causing corporate caution. This atmosphere has led to a wait-and-see attitude, which also influences the Federal Reserve’s approach.

Federal Reserve Considerations

The Federal Reserve has time to consider its policy decisions as the labour market remains stable. However, inflation risks persist, potentially creating a longer-term issue if the current tariffs remain unchanged. Concerns would arise if the labour market weakens or inflation expectations rise notably. Stagflation presents a difficult problem for central banks to manage.

While we’ve grown accustomed to the Fed holding a steady posture, the present data environment demands more calculated attention than momentum-driven trades allow. The combination of sticky price growth and weakening forward economic indicators pulls on the traditional frameworks from both sides. Traders ought to consider the implications of continued policy inertia, especially if labour metrics begin tipping in the wrong direction.

With Powell’s team keeping a watchful eye on inflation readings, clarity in macro policy is not expected any time soon. Current tariffs, inflated by several multiples in recent rounds, are feeding directly through to consumer-facing sectors. This creates the uncomfortable scenario in which demand may falter as firms pass on higher costs—precisely the outcome that prompts earnings downgrades and compresses forward multiples.

Yellen and colleagues in Treasury continue to press the message of patience, but equity and commodity volatilities tell a different story. Recent bid shifts suggest that participants are positioning for extended policy lags, not a clean rate hiking cycle nor a fresh easing trend. This makes directional betting on rates deeply risky. Instead, we have seen merit in expressing views via options strategies that isolate theta decay or exploit near-term skew dislocations.

Trade and Economic Indicators

Lighthizer’s stance, while generally in line with American trade protectionism, has introduced noise across forward rate expectation curves. Underlying assumptions in inflation swaps are no longer aligned with CPI outcomes, highlighting a disconnect between inflation forecasts and real economic data. We shouldn’t reprice long-term inflation prematurely, but duration trades call for tighter discipline. Curve flattening tendencies, already underway, are likely to deepen if output growth slows further in Q3.

Forward-looking indicators of capex demand, especially those tied to durable goods and industrial production, have weakened. This indirectly affects credit spreads—risk premiums are beginning to reflect not default fears but margin compression uncertainty. That bleeds into cost-of-capital models, driving hesitation in the equity-linked derivatives space. In such a setting, we’ve found calendar spreads backed by high-volume underliers to provide cleaner payoffs for expressing shifts in earnings volatility.

Tai’s remarks about temporary frameworks have done little to reassure longer-term investors. Rather, the entire structure of trade adjustment introduces lags that markets are only now digesting—which creates an opportunity for those focused beyond short positioning. We’re eyeing specific sectors for overreaction, particularly those with limited pass-through capability, as they may present low-volatility entries for mean-reversion trades assuming no abrupt shift in fiscal tactics.

The final thing we are watching closely is labour resilience. As long as payroll momentum holds, central policy bodies will defer aggressive intervention. But any uptick in jobless claims or flattening in wage pressure may prompt a shift in pricing. The problem for derivative participants is not directionality, but timing. Lagged data responses can distort implied volatilities just enough to make simple strategies ineffective. This is why we continue to favour expressions that benefit from ranges rather than point forecasts.

In all, what we’ve seen emerges as a situation where static exposure brings mounting discomfort. When pricing channels are unclear and rate policy rests on mixed economic inputs, simplification must yield to precision. That, at least for the next quarter, is the broader challenge participants will need to navigate.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.